Just because some characters got cheap and a mode that we knew was going to suck before the game came out lived up to that said ruling doesn't make a bad game.
I'm not going to say that SC3>SC2 because that's not true. It's not a bad game and just because it:
1) Didn't live up to the second game in most people's opinions.
2) Replaced character glitches with other ones.
3) Made some charcters that veterans were used to completely different and in some cases worse than before.
4)Threw in a lot of modes that were somewhat pointless.
5) Computer AI got worse.
...doesn't make it terrible. Nitpicking an otherwise solid fighting game isn't going to make things better. What's done is done. SCL is probably going to suck but don't most fighting game spinoffs suffer the same fate? (VF For Kids, Death By Degrees, Guilty Gear: Dust Strikers, etc) I know Puzzle Fighter is one of the exceptions so don't mention it.
A little ranting yes but the point is IMO SC3 doesn't suck. It just wasn't as good as SC2 or 1.
Last edited by Vangulus The Great : 05-12-2007 at 12:57 AM.
|