Quote:
Originally Posted by horatio  Yes, it was the original version, and the original tempo changes were not accurate. I will take another look. |
They were never 'inaccurate' what is there today is simply what I once had with an addition made through SulferDragons suggestion.
Quote:
Originally Posted by horatio Back on topic... how about showing a provisional rating, then? When 1% of downloads get a rating of any kind, almost all of the sims will have n/a. If there's any kind of rating available, that may encourage people to contribute their own ratings, especially if they disagree with the current rating. |
I agree, it should not require five ratings to show what the rating is. Honestly it should probably start with the first rating. Because it's true, people will rate based on their disagreeing with the posted rating. I've seen it happen.
Quote:
Originally Posted by horatio Also, just to defend my original point: if someone takes the time to read the comments, a comment that explains what sucks about a file or says "This is good but..." would also be very helpful. |
However, since people are lazy enough to not simply click a number, the likelihood that they will read through a list of comments is ZERO.
Quote:
Originally Posted by horatio And still no one has given me an example of what ratings to give in the situations I have described. |
This is simple, when I run into a keyboard file, which is a total and complete waste of my time and overall junk (keyboard files in general), I give a 2 IF the bpm/gap are correct. I simply feel that keyboard files are trash, and a 2 is what that file is worth to me, yeah it might not be fair, but it's honest from my side. Just be honest to what that sim is worth to you.
Of course leave a comment as well, honestly I find it intensely aggravating to find a rating but no comment, or a comment with no rating, either one without the other is just irritating.