Okay. I don't really know what your problem is, but the stick seems pretty far jammed up your ass. I suggest relieving some of the pressure.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PICASIO PICASIO  What the fuck are you talking about? Did you go to the Webster for your definition? |
No. Apparently you did though. Remember, correlation is not causation.
Quote:
|
If a DJ just says, "Hey fuck you audience I know that I'll have no control over my mixes but I'm just going to put this mix on and jack off to your sister behind the booth." He's not a fucking DJ. I don't give a shit about technicalities, technicalities never made a good DJ.
|
I never asserted that technicality = a good DJ. In fact, I really meant the exact opposite, that if they are a DJ only by technicality then they're not a good one. If you haven't noticed, I hate DJ Tiesto.
Unless you can specifically prove that a DJ who plays prerecorded mixes is not a DJ instead of just a bad one, then your argument is a No True Scotsman fallacy.
Quote:
|
Also, I think live music for the enjoyment of the audience would constitute mixing, not just sitting there while your fucking record plays smiling like a useless twat about it.
|
there's a lot more to DJing than just beatmatching transitions between songs. It's the DJ's job to pump up their audience as well so that they have a better time. A DJ that just stands there, mixing or not mixing, is a bad DJ too.
Quote:
|
Therein lies a DJ who doesn't mix isn't a fucking DJ. Or are you saying that whenever your friend put in a CD in the car and made you listen to it that all the sudden he's a DJ now because he is playing live music for an audience. So is every douchebag rolling around playing the new Disturbed album and 50 decibels in their Dodge RAM all the sudden a DISK JOCKEY?
|
I'll correct my wording; a DJ is someone who plays music live for a party. That should clear up any problems you have, right?