[I AM THE PROPHECY.]

Originally Posted by dieKatze88

Fuck Bethesda's policies toward the PS3. I remember one of their number mentioning how much they loved the PS3 platform in terms of power back at E3 before Fallout 3 came out, and then... we don't get the DLC. I don't own an Xbox 360. My brother does. I don't get to use it often. I do own a PS3. I get to use that. Guess what I buy games on. I shouldn't have to deal with this bullshit because I own a different console (read: not even arguing better here.) Just as I feel I shouldn't need to buy a Japanese Xbox 360 to play Otomedius G (As opposed to a domestic one, one much easier to obtain and maintain in the VERY LIKELY event of a hardware failure), I don't feel I should have to own a Xbox 360 in general to play six to eight hours of Downloadable content.

Until Bethesda shows the PS3 platform that it gives a fuck. I'm not going to go out of my way to be excited about another game they make. Its fairly simple, if you aren't going to support the platform I use properly, I'm not going to care.

And don't even make this about market share, because really, if game developers gave a fuck about market share they would all make board games. Everyone has a fucking table.

Microsoft paid for the exclusivity.

Originally Posted by CStarFlare

I have to admit that the lack of DLC wouldn't bother me, but maybe I'd think differently if I didn't have firsthand experience that Operation Anchorage is fucking boring.

Is the Pitt any good? Anchorage didn't impress me but I haven't played through it at lower levels. Maybe it's more fun without crazy-high stealth and combat skills.

Originally Posted by holy what

Bethesda should develop solely for the PC fuck anyone that thinks otherwise.

This is basically true, so long as they continue to support the 360 controller in PC games because F3 was comfortable on it