See Vistah pretty much just proved my point. Until it becomes or is directly influenced by reality (like the bizarre, bizarre example xybur said earlier) it's not pedophilia. Even according to the DSM-IV (yeah that's right I'm a hobbyist in psychology what's your point), it can't be claimed as pedophilia until it starts being a problem or being acted upon.
Until then it's just, as I said, guys who get turned on by cute smaller girls; which thanks in a very large part to how fucked up the human psyche is is fairly normal.
Pedophilia is a mental disorder. Lolikon isn't.
EDIT: Quote: |
Originally Posted by kbandressen I agree with Xybur, loli is playing with fire. If you can fap to loli and live a normal life then more power to you, but it can definitely lead to unhealthy attractions. | This is the same argument as the "gateway drug" theory, which is quite frankly a load of shit. Someone with a predisposition towards real children may find lolikon and grow attached to it for that reason, but those who stricly like lolikon art don't care for it for the same reason as a real pedophile, and aren't going to "cross over" into being sexual predators as a result of it.
__________________
i am vengeans. i am teh nite. i, bortman.
i should probably point out somewhere here that i'm dewgy shouldn't i
Last edited by Dewgy : 08-01-2006 at 11:28 AM.
|