07-21-2008, 11:57 PM
|
#31 | | g//ay for k//eternal
WiLLiSTER is offline
Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: MontereyPark, CA Posts: 946
Marketplace Rating: 1
Tokens: 3,755.39
Bank: 1.24
Total Tokens: 3,756.63 Donate Tokens | But would you really want an encore performance. After playing a role like that so well, there would be huge expectations to what the next rendition should be. I'm not saying I'm glad he died, he was brilliant. I just think it might be better this way. Leaving it how it ended, not continuing (lord, let's hope they don't find someone else to do it).
I'm off to go watch it a second time. Goodnight everyone
backhomeedit: Just as good as the first time!
__________________ Hallå där...
Last edited by WiLLiSTER : 07-22-2008 at 04:19 AM.
| |
| |
07-22-2008, 10:08 AM
|
#32 | | //bemanistyle::[Regular]
Blackraven is offline
Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Makati, Philippines Posts: 3,060
Marketplace Rating: 0
Tokens: 951.00
Bank: 551,805.82
Total Tokens: 552,756.82 Donate Tokens | My friend was telling me that Heath Ledger's performance as Joker was so good that he wants that no one else ever play the role of the Joker again. 
__________________  | |
| |
07-22-2008, 05:52 PM
|
#33 | | 64
Shun is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 1,129
Marketplace Rating: 4
Tokens: 1,078.58
Bank: 802,230.78
Total Tokens: 803,309.36 Donate Tokens | Quote:
Originally Posted by WiLLiSTER But would you really want an encore performance. After playing a role like that so well, there would be huge expectations to what the next rendition should be. I'm not saying I'm glad he died, he was brilliant. I just think it might be better this way. Leaving it how it ended, not continuing (lord, let's hope they don't find someone else to do it).
I'm off to go watch it a second time. Goodnight everyone
backhomeedit: Just as good as the first time! | Well they replaced Katie Holmes roll of Rachel with some ugly chick so I wouldn't be surprised if they made Rosie O'Donnell play the Joker in a sequel. | |
| |
07-22-2008, 08:57 PM
|
#34 | | Jesus Freak
SF1 is offline
Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: If not on here, probably at church. Posts: 236
Marketplace Rating: 0
Tokens: 91.42
Bank: 0.99
Total Tokens: 92.41 Donate Tokens | Friend of mine said she heard that the Joker role was so disturbing that it may have driven Ledger to commit suicide.
To which I replied, "WHY SO SERIOUS?"
Last edited by SF1 : 07-23-2008 at 04:48 PM.
Reason: i'm a retrad hu cant spel.
| |
| |  | |  |
07-22-2008, 09:36 PM
|
#35 | | 3rd easiest 42 ever rite
Brett is offline
Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Orlando/Ponte Vedra Beach, FL Posts: 943
Marketplace Rating: 1
Tokens: 4,469.67
Bank: 0.00
Total Tokens: 4,469.67 Donate Tokens | Quote:
Originally Posted by Eshmasesh oh my GOD this movie was awesome. The only thing I think sucks about it is the fact that I'll never see Heath Ledger play Joker again, or anyone nearly as good. He owned Jack Nicholson's portrayal of Joker hard. | I wish people would stop trying to say one role outdoes the other. You're trying to compare two completely different character types. Nicholson's Joker was great, there's no reason to say that his joker is bad in comparison to Ledger. Nicholson's Joker was a comic relief character, with the gag props and crazy circus-like schemes. That was how the Joker was portrayed in the earlier Batman's and he nailed it. Ledger's Joker is a completely different entity. His Joker was a murderous psychopath who was there to inspire horror in the audience. His only gag or motif was having his henchmen wear the clown masks, nothing corny or cheesy. Both are great, but trying to compare them is like comparing a baseball player to a guitar player. | |
| |  |
07-22-2008, 09:50 PM
|
#36 | | g//ay for k//eternal
WiLLiSTER is offline
Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: MontereyPark, CA Posts: 946
Marketplace Rating: 1
Tokens: 3,755.39
Bank: 1.24
Total Tokens: 3,756.63 Donate Tokens | Quote:
Originally Posted by Shun Well they replaced Katie Holmes roll of Rachel with some ugly chick so I wouldn't be surprised if they made Rosie O'Donnell play the Joker in a sequel. | I think Maggie Gyllenhaal is wayyyy hotter than Katie Holmes and I'm really glad they did replace her.
__________________ Hallå där... | |
| |
07-22-2008, 11:27 PM
|
#37 | | 64
Shun is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 1,129
Marketplace Rating: 4
Tokens: 1,078.58
Bank: 802,230.78
Total Tokens: 803,309.36 Donate Tokens | Quote:
Originally Posted by WiLLiSTER I think Maggie Gyllenhaal is wayyyy hotter than Katie Holmes and I'm really glad they did replace her. | Wait, she's Jake's sister? WHAT WHAT
Katie Holmes minus the Scientology is supersex. | |
| |
07-22-2008, 11:32 PM
|
#38 | | c.o.s.m.i.c.o.l.o.r
kimcicle is offline
Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: GODDAMN TEXAS Posts: 1,406
Marketplace Rating: 1
Tokens: 9,997.00
Bank: 237,745,861.40
Total Tokens: 237,755,858.40 Donate Tokens | The movie was kinda long for my taste, but still good.
In my opinion, it's a shame that everybody is focusing on Ledger's performance. It was great, that's for sure, but Aaron Eckhard and Gary Oldman were both stellar. If they had that type of performance for any other movie, they would have been in tight contention for best supporting actor IMO. | |
| |
07-23-2008, 02:45 AM
|
#39 | | g//ay for k//eternal
WiLLiSTER is offline
Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: MontereyPark, CA Posts: 946
Marketplace Rating: 1
Tokens: 3,755.39
Bank: 1.24
Total Tokens: 3,756.63 Donate Tokens | Quote:
Originally Posted by Shun Wait, she's Jake's sister? WHAT WHAT
Katie Holmes minus the Scientology is supersex. | LOL
I liked her pre-tom. Now she tends to remind me of pulp fiction Uma Thurman which most definitely wasn't hot in my book. (and yea, jake's sister ;D)
And I agree 100% with what Kim said. Oldman and Eckhart were both outstanding.
__________________ Hallå där...
Last edited by WiLLiSTER : 07-23-2008 at 02:50 AM.
| |
| |
07-23-2008, 10:09 AM
|
#40 | | simple semens stop STOP STOP!!
Reenee is offline
Join Date: May 2005 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 3,877
Marketplace Rating: 0
Tokens: 5,305.72
Bank: 154,376,000.00
Total Tokens: 154,381,305.71 Donate Tokens | Quote:
Originally Posted by SF1 Friend of mine said she heard that the Joker role was so disturbing that it may have driven Ledger to suicided.
To which I replied, "WHY SO SERIOUS?" | You are a clever girl. | |
| |  | |  |
07-23-2008, 04:38 PM
|
#41 | | //bemanistyle::[Member]
Eshmasesh is offline
Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Atlanta, Georgia Posts: 445
Marketplace Rating: 0
Tokens: 4,194.35
Bank: 0.00
Total Tokens: 4,194.35 Donate Tokens | Quote:
Originally Posted by Brett I wish people would stop trying to say one role outdoes the other. You're trying to compare two completely different character types. Nicholson's Joker was great, there's no reason to say that his joker is bad in comparison to Ledger. Nicholson's Joker was a comic relief character, with the gag props and crazy circus-like schemes. That was how the Joker was portrayed in the earlier Batman's and he nailed it. Ledger's Joker is a completely different entity. His Joker was a murderous psychopath who was there to inspire horror in the audience. His only gag or motif was having his henchmen wear the clown masks, nothing corny or cheesy. Both are great, but trying to compare them is like comparing a baseball player to a guitar player. | I believe that Ledger's Joker was better than Nicholson's for the sole fact that, although Nicholson played his part very well, his acting was not out-of-the-box. He has the same suave grunginess about him with intermittent comedic relief that he's shown in many other roles he's played. He just made it more clown-like and creepy and it worked.
In all honesty, Ledger plays a role just as true to the comic book series as Nicholson's, because Joker really was a sociopathic killer without any empathy. But the main thing that stood out to me is that he really got into the character's persona, one which was very different from any role he's done before, and it was perfectly believable.
I stand by my statement.
__________________ | |
| |  |
07-23-2008, 04:49 PM
|
#42 | | Jesus Freak
SF1 is offline
Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: If not on here, probably at church. Posts: 236
Marketplace Rating: 0
Tokens: 91.42
Bank: 0.99
Total Tokens: 92.41 Donate Tokens | Quote:
Originally Posted by Reenee You are a clever girl. | Thing was, she hadn't seen the movie, so she didn't know what I was talking about.  | |
| |
07-26-2008, 01:05 PM
|
#43 | | ~ Homoeroticism ~
VGD is offline
Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: circle circle dot dot Posts: 993
Marketplace Rating: 0
Tokens: 1,876.76
Bank: 791,705.42
Total Tokens: 793,582.18 Donate Tokens | What, no one's gonna talk about Harvey Dent and Two-face?
__________________  | |
| |
07-28-2008, 02:31 PM
|
#44 | | //bemanistyle::[Member]
koa5001 is offline
Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Baltimore, MD Posts: 246
Marketplace Rating: 0
Tokens: 17,936.00
Bank: 7,158,825.07
Total Tokens: 7,176,761.07 Donate Tokens | I watched it last weekend with my brother. Overall I thought it was an amazing movie! Everyone who came back to reprise their roles did an excellent job. Heath Ledger's performance as the Joker was absolutely stellar! It was sick, twisted, and amazing all at the same time (disappearing pencil trick anyone?). I think that Two-Face was a bit short lived just like Venom was in Spider-Man 3. I was hoping that he would carry over into the next film (if there is one planned...I don't know for sure). Overall the movie was brilliant and I enjoyed it very much!
__________________  Wii Console Number: 7804 3626 7275 8332 Brawl FC: 0516-7950-6983 (PM if you add me!)
| |
| |
07-28-2008, 11:06 PM
|
#45 | | Jesus Freak
SF1 is offline
Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: If not on here, probably at church. Posts: 236
Marketplace Rating: 0
Tokens: 91.42
Bank: 0.99
Total Tokens: 92.41 Donate Tokens | I can't understand why the Joker gave two different accounts for the scars. | |
| |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:10 PM. | | |