Fastest BPM on a Song

[TheNoSoMan]

What's the fastest song you ever played. I got !(Z)x(Z)! at 1000000013848427900000000 BPM.

[Mollocephalus]

bpm isn't important

frequency of arrows is

[Oni-91]

I don't have songs over 999 BPM, otherwise the BPM counter looks sloppy.

[ca25nada]

self explanatory.
(couldn't resist playing with the displaybpm tag)



the highest bpm that i actually have is about a 1000bpm from a random japanese song

[Detach]

That's pretty intense, and pretty stupid, I think.

[I Am Rey Pinyoko!!!]

If you're talking of an official DDR music, it's Pluto Relinquish (with 800 BPM). But I do have a tempo higher than PR which is 888 BPM... I just forgot the name of that music...

[ca25nada]

in that case ill go for in the groove official charts

ITG2 - Robotix
i remember as it being 1337 bpm or somthing close to that in the middle of the song

[PROGUY101]

The highest BPM in my collection is 1,000,000 BPM (C-R-A-S-H-E-R)

Maybe someone should ramp the fastest song to something a human cannot reach... Something that a human eye cannot see :p

[Akira]

Originally Posted by Necros

bpm isn't important

frequency of arrows is

Quoted for truth.

And for the sake of it, nothing beats the warp-speed of Negative BPM.

[TrueFSX]

Originally Posted by Akira

Quoted for truth.

And for the sake of it, nothing beats the warp-speed of Negative BPM.

Except maybe the warp-speed of 100,000+ BPM.

[Mollocephalus]

that's only fictional, that scroll speed would overcome the keytapping sound barrier and throw your keyboardsmash into another dimension while the time flows upside down and quantums colliding creating a black hole in your desktop not if arrows eat cornflakes.

[akstylish]

Originally Posted by Necros

that's only fictional, that scroll speed would overcome the keytapping sound barrier and throw your keyboardsmash into another dimension while the time flows upside down and quantums colliding creating a black hole in your desktop not if arrows eat cornflakes.

D:

Anyway, anything over 4 digit bpm is to simulate negative bpm, since it was 'fixed' in 4.0.

[Patashu]

negative bpm is technically infinitely fast, so infinity bpm

edit: and 4+ digit bpms can't simulate negative bpms because it won't skip over intervening notes, which is basically the only reason you'd want to be using a negative bpm

[Akira]

Originally Posted by Patashu

negative bpm is technically infinitely fast, so bpm/0

Fixed.

[Patashu]

except bpm/0 is unsigned infinity and could be pointing backwards

and that doesn't clarify my point or make any insightful relation or anything so :d